You are now familiar with the notions of extensions and labellings.

• Most of the argumentation semantics that you have seen are based on the notion of (standard) admissibility (except CF2).
• Are there any alternatives to standard admissibility?
• Can we adapt extensions to make them more suitable for dialogues?

2.1 Strong admissibility (Baroni & Giacomin 2007)

2.2 Weak admissibility (Baumann et al. 2020)

2.3 Re-casting extension-based semantics (Baumann et al. 2020)

2.4 Linking everything together (Baumann et al. 2020)

2.5 Decomposing extensions for dialogues! (Thimm 2022)

2.6 Conclusion